“I interpret this as evidence that the PI is an excellent networker but that he does not have sufficient required scientific expertise and capacity to successfully execute the project.”
Peer review: Anonymous reviewer on Grant proposal
“I interpret this as evidence that the PI is an excellent networker but that he does not have sufficient required scientific expertise and capacity to successfully execute the project.”
Peer review: Anonymous reviewer on Grant proposal
“Maybe this paper could be suitable for a journal with readers in statistical genetics or medical mathematics, if such journals exist.”
Peer review: Anonymous reviewer on Manuscript under review
“The arguments in the paper are compelling but not convincing.”
Peer review: Anonymous reviewer on Manuscript under review
“Season’s Greetings! I apologise for my slow response but a roast goose prevented me from answering emails for a few days.”
Peer review: Anonymous reviewer on Manuscript under review, A journal in microbiology
“The writing style is flowery and has an air of Oscar Wilde about it.”
Peer review: Anonymous reviewer on Manuscript under review, A journal in microbiology
“The finding is not novel and the solution induces despair.”
Peer review: Anonymous reviewer on Manuscript under review, A journal in microbiology