“Finally, it is impossible for the reader to keep track of the hundreds (thousands?) of acronyms in the paper. If there ever is an award for most acronyms in a paper, this one would win it hands down.”
Peer review: Anonymous reviewer on Manuscript under review
“the authors seem to be reinventing the wheel and a flat tire to go along with it.”
Peer review: Anonymous reviewer on Manuscript under review
“The author writes like a drunken after-dinner speaker.”
Peer review: Anonymous reviewer on Manuscript under review, A journal in the social sciences
“Season’s Greetings! I apologise for my slow response but a roast goose prevented me from answering emails for a few days.”
Peer review: Anonymous reviewer on Manuscript under review, A journal in microbiology
“The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave work and go home early and then spend time to wonder what life is about.”
Peer review: Anonymous reviewer on Manuscript under review, A journal in microbiology
“Reject – More holes than my grandad’s string vest!”
Peer review: Anonymous reviewer on Manuscript under review, A journal in microbiology
“The biggest problem with this manuscript, which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style.”
Peer review: Anonymous reviewer on Manuscript under review, A journal in microbiology